Table of contents

Manual · Page 33 · 17 min

Chapter 31 | Collections: Chasing, Negotiating, Resolving

Chapter 31 | Collections: Chasing, Negotiating, Resolving - online reading page from the From Sales to Cash handbook, dedicated to the Quote-to-Cash cycle and Credit Management.

Collections is not only about chasing.

Chasing is necessary. Due dates must be reminded, payment must be requested, promises must be followed, the right contacts must be reached and professional pressure must be maintained on open invoices.

But chasing is not enough.

Repeated reminders on a non-payable invoice will not bring cash in. A standard reminder on a complex dispute will solve nothing. An aggressive reminder to a customer waiting for a legitimate credit note can damage the relationship. A weak reminder to a customer deliberately using delay as financing can be ineffective.

Mature Collections is therefore not limited to sending reminders.

It seeks to understand the cause of the delay, obtain a credible commitment, secure a payment promise, propose a payment plan when necessary, prioritize high-impact amounts, escalate at the right level and maintain a professional relationship.

It moves from a pressure logic to a resolution logic.

The objective is not only to ask the customer to pay.

The objective is to remove what prevents payment from arriving.

Chasing Remains Essential

Chasing and resolution should not be opposed.

Chasing remains a foundation of Collections.

A customer may simply have forgotten. An invoice may have reached due date without being prioritized. A payment may be waiting for approval. An Accounts Payable department may process faster when a supplier seriously follows its receivables.

Chasing shows that the company manages its cash.

An absence of reminders may be interpreted by some customers as implicit tolerance. The quietest suppliers are sometimes paid last.

Chasing therefore makes it possible to remind the due date, obtain a payment date, detect a blockage, confirm receipt of the invoice and keep the invoice in the customer’s priorities.

But chasing must be intelligent.

It must not be only automatic. It must evolve according to the amount, age, cause of delay, customer profile and behavior history.

Chase, yes. But chase with diagnosis.

Understanding the Cause of the Delay

The first question in Collections is simple: why has this invoice not been paid?

This question avoids treating all delays in the same way.

Has the customer received the invoice?

Is the invoice recorded?

Is it compliant?

Is a purchase order missing?

Is receipt validated?

Is there a dispute?

Is a credit note expected?

Has payment already been made but not matched?

Does the customer lack cash?

Is it deliberately waiting for reminders?

The answer determines the action.

If a document is missing, it must be provided.

If the invoice is incorrect, it must be corrected.

If a dispute exists, it must be qualified and resolved.

If the customer has cash difficulties, a plan must be negotiated.

If payment is announced, a credible date must be obtained and followed.

Without understanding the cause, chasing may become repetitive, costly and ineffective.

Collections as a Diagnosis Function

Collections is often the first place where problems in the Quote-to-Cash cycle become visible.

The customer replies: “We have not received the invoice.”

“The PO is incorrect.”

“The portal rejected the invoice.”

“The service performed has not been validated.”

“We are waiting for a credit note.”

“We have already paid.”

“We dispute the delivery.”

“We will pay next month.”

Each answer contains information.

Collections must know how to use it.

It must distinguish a real customer risk from an internal problem, a real dispute from an excuse, a reliable promise from a weak promise, an administrative blockage from a financial difficulty.

This diagnostic ability transforms Collections.

It is no longer only about pushing the customer.

It is about understanding the shortest path to cash.

Obtaining a Credible Commitment

A payment promise has value only if it is credible.

The customer may say: “we will pay soon,” “the payment is in progress,” “it will be settled quickly,” “I will check with Accounting.”

These formulations are too vague.

They do not make it possible to forecast cash, follow the commitment or measure the customer’s reliability.

Collections must obtain a precise commitment.

What amount will be paid?

Which invoices are concerned?

On what date?

By which method?

Who confirms?

Is payment approved or only requested?

Is there any remaining obstacle?

A good payment promise is dated, quantified, linked to invoices and given by a contact able to commit or confirm the process.

The more precise the commitment, the more usable it is.

Collections must not settle for an intention. It must seek a payment decision.

Securing a Payment Promise

Obtaining a promise is not enough. It must be secured.

This means confirming it, recording it, following it and reacting if it is not kept.

A promise can be confirmed by email, noted in the collection tool, linked to the invoices concerned and followed on the expected date.

If the customer promises payment on the 15th, Collections must check on the 15th or 16th whether the payment has arrived or whether proof is available.

If the promise is not kept, this fact must be recorded.

A broken promise is customer behavior information.

It may justify a firmer reminder, escalation, an order block, a limit reduction or the request for a formalized payment plan.

A customer that keeps its promises remains manageable.

A customer that promises without paying becomes a risk.

The payment promise is therefore both a collection tool and a trust indicator.

Preventive Chasing and Curative Chasing

Collections does not necessarily start after due date.

For important customers, sensitive invoices or high amounts, preventive chasing can be very effective.

It consists of checking before due date that the invoice has been received, accepted, recorded, validated and scheduled for payment.

This approach makes it possible to detect blockages early.

If the portal has rejected the invoice, it is better to know immediately than on the due date.

If the purchase order is incorrect, it is better to correct it before payment is expected.

If the service performed is not validated, it is better to mobilize Operations before the invoice ages.

Curative chasing takes place after the delay.

Preventive chasing protects cash before the delay exists.

Mature Collections combines both.

Prioritizing Amounts

Not all invoices should be handled with the same intensity.

Collections must prioritize.

High amounts.

Risky customers.

Old invoices.

Invoices close to becoming very old.

Strategic customers.

Delays that block new orders.

Undisputed but unpaid invoices.

Broken promises.

High-value disputes.

A small old invoice may require a clean-up action. A recent but very significant invoice may require immediate attention. A customer that usually pays well may be treated differently from a customer that accumulates broken commitments.

Prioritizing does not mean abandoning the rest.

It means allocating effort where it will have the strongest impact on cash, risk and the relationship.

Collections is a time management function.

It requires knowing where energy produces the most results.

Prioritizing by Cause

Priority must not be only financial.

It must also take into account the cause of the delay.

An invoice blocked because of a missing document can be resolved quickly if the right document exists.

An undisputed but unpaid invoice with a slow customer may require firm chasing.

An old dispute with no owner may require internal escalation.

An unmatched payment can be handled with cash application.

A customer financial difficulty may require a payment plan or a block.

Collections must therefore classify its actions not only by amount and age, but also by resolution lever.

What can be released quickly?

What consumes the most cash?

What may deteriorate?

What depends on the customer?

What depends on us?

This prioritization by cause makes Collections more effective.

Proposing a Payment Plan

When a customer cannot pay immediately, a payment plan can be a solution.

It must not be granted automatically. It should be used when the customer recognizes its debt, communicates clearly and shows a willingness to regularize the situation.

A good payment plan specifies the invoices concerned, the amounts, the payment dates, the consequences if it is not respected and the conditions for continuing the commercial relationship.

It must be realistic.

A payment plan that is too ambitious will quickly be broken. A payment plan that is too long can turn the company into a passive financier.

A balance must be found.

The payment plan is a negotiation.

It must reduce exposure progressively, not only postpone the problem.

It must also be monitored rigorously.

If the customer does not respect the first installment, trust deteriorates immediately. The conditions must then be reviewed, orders blocked if necessary or the case escalated.

A useful payment plan is a path back to normal.

Not an elegant way to postpone the unpaid invoice.

Negotiating Without Losing Control

Collections is a form of negotiation.

The customer may ask for time, dispute an amount, propose partial payment, request a credit note, promise a date, ask for delivery despite overdue invoices.

Collections must listen, understand and look for a solution.

But it must also keep control.

It must not accept vague promises.

It must not let a partial dispute block the whole outstanding balance.

It must not accept unjustified deductions.

It must not indefinitely extend a payment plan that is not respected.

It must not let the customer alone impose the rhythm.

Negotiating does not mean suffering.

It means seeking an agreement that protects cash and, when possible, maintains the relationship.

Mature Collections knows how to be firm without being aggressive.

It knows how to be open without being weak.

Obtaining Payment of the Undisputed Amount

When an invoice or an account includes a partial dispute, Collections must seek to obtain payment of the undisputed amount.

This is a very operational rule.

If the customer disputes 10,000 euros out of an outstanding balance of 100,000 euros, it must pay the remaining 90,000 euros.

If it is waiting for a credit note of 5,000 euros, this does not always justify blocking 80,000 euros.

If it disputes one invoice line, the other lines must be discussed separately.

This approach reduces tied-up cash.

It prevents the dispute from becoming a global blocking tool.

It also forces clarification of the exact amount of disagreement.

Collections must therefore ask: what amount do you precisely dispute, and can you immediately settle the recognized balance?

This simple question can release a lot of cash.

Escalating at the Right Level

Some files cannot be resolved at operational level.

The company must know how to escalate.

Internal escalation to the salesperson, the sales manager, Operations, Finance, the Credit Manager, Legal or management.

External escalation to an accounting manager, a buyer, the customer’s CFO, a project sponsor or a director.

Escalation is not a sign of failure.

It is a resolution tool when the current level can no longer move the file forward.

But it must be well prepared.

What is the amount?

For how long has it been overdue?

What is the cause?

What actions have already been taken?

What decision is expected?

What risk exists if nothing happens?

Who must intervene?

A vague escalation produces little result.

A precise escalation can quickly release a situation.

Mature Collections knows when to continue at the current level and when to move the file upward.

Escalating Without Breaking the Relationship

Escalating does not mean immediately threatening.

Escalation can be professional, factual and constructive.

It means saying: the file is blocked, the amount is significant, delays are lengthening, commitments have not been respected, we need a decision.

The tone must remain controlled.

The customer relationship can be firm without becoming conflictual.

Collections represents the company. Its way of communicating influences the supplier’s image.

An escalation that is too aggressive can close the dialogue.

An escalation that is too weak may change nothing.

The objective is to obtain attention at the right level, not to create an unnecessary crisis.

Professional firmness is often more effective than emotional pressure.

Maintaining a Professional Relationship

Collections sometimes handles tense situations.

Repeated delays, broken promises, disputes, irritated customers, salespeople under pressure, significant cash stakes.

In these situations, relationship quality is essential.

Collections must remain factual, precise, respectful and consistent.

It must avoid unnecessary accusations, personal judgments or contradictory messages.

It must rely on facts: invoice, due date, amount, payment term, commitment, document, status, expected action.

This posture protects the company’s credibility.

It also makes it possible to preserve the commercial relationship when it deserves to be preserved.

A customer may be late without being a bad customer. A dispute may be real. A difficulty may be temporary.

But professionalism does not exclude firmness.

The relationship is better maintained when rules are clear and applied.

Adapting the Tone to the Customer Profile

Not all customers should be chased in the same way.

A loyal customer, usually punctual, with an isolated delay, can be contacted with a clarification approach.

A customer that is systematically late must receive a firmer and more structured reminder.

A customer in difficulty must be directed toward a solution discussion: partial payment, payment plan, reduction of exposure.

A customer that uses disputes as an excuse must be challenged precisely.

A large account with a heavy process sometimes requires preventive chasing and monitoring of internal statuses.

A small accessible customer can be handled more directly.

Adapting the tone does not mean making unjustified preferences.

It means using the most effective method according to behavior, risk, amount and relationship.

Collections is a discipline of precision.

Phone, Email and Written Trace

The choice of channel matters.

Email is useful to formalize, send documents, obtain confirmation and keep a trace.

The phone is often more effective to quickly understand a blockage, identify the right contact, negotiate a payment date or clarify a misunderstanding.

Customer portals and platforms may be essential to follow statuses.

Mature Collections uses channels in a complementary way.

A call can release a situation, but it often must be confirmed in writing.

An email can formalize a promise, but it may remain unanswered.

A written trace is important, especially for commitments, disputes, payment plans, deductions and escalations.

The rule is simple: discuss to move forward, write to secure.

The Role of Documents

Collections must rely on solid documents.

Invoices.

Account statements.

Purchase orders.

Delivery notes.

Acceptance reports.

Intervention reports.

Contracts.

Credit notes.

Validation exchanges.

Proof of portal upload.

Payment promises.

Without documents, Collections becomes a discussion of opinions.

With documents, it becomes a discussion of facts.

A customer that disputes must receive or produce precise elements.

An effective collector knows how to quickly find the necessary documents or mobilize the teams that hold them.

Document availability directly influences collection speed.

A good file is easier to collect than an incomplete file.

Collections and Sales

Collections must not be isolated from Sales.

Salespeople know the customer, the contacts, the tensions, the potential, the negotiations and sometimes the reasons for a blockage.

They can help obtain payment, resolve a dispute, explain a condition, support an escalation or carry a sensitive message.

But the salesperson must not replace Collections.

Their role is complementary.

Collections brings follow-up discipline, amount precision, promise history, due date reading and documentary rigor.

Sales brings relational and commercial knowledge.

Together, they can resolve faster.

But contradictory messages must be avoided.

If Collections requests payment and the salesperson promises delivery without conditions, the company’s position is weakened.

Alignment is essential.

Collections and Credit Management

Collections directly feeds Credit Management.

It provides information on the customer’s real behavior: delays, promises kept or broken, disputes, deductions, communication quality, willingness to pay, causes of blockage.

This information must influence limits, payment terms, blocks, down payment requests, guarantees and release decisions.

A customer that keeps its promises can be supported.

A customer that promises without paying must be framed.

A customer that systematically disputes must be analyzed.

A customer that pays only after reminders must be followed differently.

Collections is therefore a source of risk intelligence.

It is not limited to recovering cash. It helps understand customer quality.

Collections and Operations

When the delay comes from delivery, service, receipt or evidence, Operations is essential.

Collections must know how to mobilize the right internal contacts.

It must not only forward an email and wait.

It must explain the cash stakes, set an action, request a response date, follow up and escalate if necessary.

Operations must understand that its response can release payment.

A report not transmitted, validation not obtained or reservation not treated can tie up significant amounts.

Mature Collections connects operational teams to cash.

It makes the financial impact of apparently technical topics visible.

Collections and Cash Application

Collections must also work with cash application.

Before strongly chasing a customer, it must check whether a recent payment has been received.

Unreferenced payments, grouped payments, partial payments, deductions and offsets can blur the account reading.

A customer chased for an invoice already paid loses trust.

Conversely, a poorly understood partial payment can leave an open balance without clear action.

Coordination between Collections and cash application is therefore essential.

Collections must transmit payment proofs obtained from the customer.

Cash application must flag unallocated payments or unexplained deductions.

Together, they maintain a reliable customer account.

Amicable Collections and Progressive Firmness

Collections generally starts with an amicable logic.

Due date reminder, status request, reminder, call, payment confirmation, resolution of blockages.

But if the customer does not answer, does not respect its commitments or refuses to pay without justification, firmness must increase.

More formal reminder.

Escalation.

Order block.

Formal notice.

Transfer to Legal.

External collection.

Litigation.

This progression must be controlled.

Too fast, it can damage a relationship that could have been resolved. Too slow, it allows the receivable to age and reduces the chances of collection.

Mature Collections knows how to increase pressure step by step, with clear criteria.

Firmness must arrive at the right time.

When to Move to Litigation

Litigation is not a moral failure. It is sometimes a necessary step.

It becomes relevant when the customer does not pay despite reminders, does not respect payment plans, no longer responds, disputes without basis, presents a risk of disappearing, or when the amount justifies a formal action.

But before moving to litigation, the solidity of the file must be checked.

Payable invoice.

Contract or order available.

Proof of delivery or service.

No real untreated dispute.

Documented reminders.

Broken promises recorded.

Clear balance.

A weak file will be more difficult to defend.

Litigation must not be used to compensate for a poorly prepared invoice.

It must be used when the company has a solid file and the customer still does not pay.

Measuring Collections Performance

Collections performance is not measured only by the amount collected.

The quality of the action must also be considered.

Amounts collected.

Reduction of delays.

Promises obtained and kept.

Dispute resolution time.

Amount of undisputed payments obtained.

Reduction of old invoices.

Number of reminders required.

Rate of corrected invoices.

Causes of delay identified.

Files escalated on time.

Quality of comments.

Collections that collects a lot but lets causes repeat does not truly improve the cycle.

Mature Collections produces cash and information.

It helps the company sell better, invoice better, document better and decide better.

Example: Simple Chasing Is Enough

An invoice of 15,000 euros is overdue by five days.

The customer usually pays well. After contact, it says that the invoice has been approved but that payment will be made in the next cycle, in three days.

Collections confirms the date by email, records the promise and checks collection.

Payment arrives as planned.

In this case, a simple and professional reminder is enough.

There was no need to block, escalate or negotiate a payment plan.

Good Collections is proportionate.

Example: Chasing Is Not Enough, Resolution Is Needed

An invoice of 80,000 euros is overdue by 45 days.

Several reminders have been sent. The customer finally replies that the invoice is rejected in the portal because the purchase order number does not match.

Continuing to chase will be useless.

The issue must be resolved: identify the right PO, correct the invoice or obtain regularization, upload it again in the portal, confirm acceptance and follow the new payment date.

Mature Collections changes action as soon as it understands the cause.

The problem was not customer silence. It was an invoice that could not be integrated.

Example: Broken Promise

A customer promises to pay 50,000 euros on the 20th of the month.

Payment does not arrive. The customer had already missed a previous promise.

Collections must not simply ask for a new date as if nothing had happened.

It must remind the customer of the broken commitment, request an explanation, obtain proof or immediate partial payment, alert Credit Management and consider blocking new orders.

The broken promise changes the customer profile.

It reduces trust and justifies firmer action.

Example: Useful Payment Plan

A customer recognizes that it owes 120,000 euros but is going through temporary cash tension.

It proposes to pay 20,000 euros per month over six months.

The company considers this period too long. After negotiation, a plan is established: 40,000 euros immediately, then four payments of 20,000 euros. New orders will be limited as long as the plan is not respected.

The payment plan is confirmed in writing, recorded and monitored.

The customer respects the installments.

The relationship continues, but under control.

The payment plan made it possible to resolve the situation without abandoning credit discipline.

Example: Escalation Needed

A large account owes 300,000 euros undisputed.

The invoice is validated, but payments have been postponed for two months. Accounting contacts reply that the file is “in progress,” without a precise date.

Collections escalates with a clear file: invoices concerned, dates, proof of validation, reminders, absence of dispute, impact on future deliveries.

The salesperson contacts their sponsor on the customer side. The Credit Manager indicates that new orders will be conditional on payment.

The customer schedules payment.

Escalation worked because it was factual, prepared and internally aligned.

From Pressure to Resolution

Pressure can make some customers pay.

But it does not solve everything.

If the problem is a rejected invoice, it must be corrected.

If the problem is a dispute, a decision must be made.

If the problem is missing evidence, it must be provided.

If the problem is financial difficulty, a plan must be secured.

If the problem is an unmatched payment, it must be matched.

If the problem is a bad-faith customer, the case must be escalated and the company protected.

Mature Collections knows how to use pressure, but it is not reduced to pressure.

It seeks resolution.

This posture is more effective, more professional and more value-creating.

It turns Collections into an active function of the Quote-to-Cash cycle.

Key Takeaways

Collections is not only about chasing.

Chasing is necessary, but insufficient if the cause of the delay is not understood.

Mature Collections seeks to diagnose, resolve and secure.

It identifies why the invoice is not paid, obtains a credible commitment, secures payment promises, proposes payment plans when relevant, requests payment of the undisputed amount, prioritizes significant amounts, escalates at the right level and maintains a professional relationship.

It works with Sales, Credit Management, Sales Administration, Operations, Billing, cash application, Finance and sometimes Legal.

Mature Collections moves from a pressure logic to a resolution logic.

It does not only ask the customer to pay.

It moves forward everything that allows payment to arrive.

In the Quote-to-Cash cycle, Collections is therefore much more than reminders. It is a function of diagnosis, negotiation and transformation of receivables into cash.